Bitcoin selloff driven by cycle forces, not proven manipulation
The latest Bitcoin selloff is being framed as a function of normal market dynamics rather than evidence of wrongdoing. As reported by CoinGape, market manipulation claims tying the decline to large players such as Binance or Jane Street remain unverified, while the narrative from industry leadership classifies the move as part of a classic crypto cycle.
The more conventional explanations gaining traction include profit-taking by long-term holders, forced unwinding of leveraged positions, and a rotation of capital toward other risk assets, notably AI-related plays. In this reading, sharp down days are a byproduct of thin liquidity and the mechanical impact of derivatives, not a coordinated dump.
ETF flows, liquidations, and profit-taking explain recent downside
Recent spot Bitcoin ETF outflows have added weight to the move lower, reducing a demand backstop that previously supported price discovery. Based on data from Whale Alert, the tone of ETF flows has shifted from consistent inflows to net selling in recent weeks, and on-chain movement of older coins aligns with long-horizon investors crystallizing gains. These forces, alongside cascading liquidations in over-levered futures positions, can accelerate selloffs even without any single large seller dominating the tape.
Mechanically, liquidations occur when margin falls below maintenance levels, prompting automatic position closures that amplify downside. Covered-call writing by holders can cap upside during rebounds, as option-related hedging encourages selling into strength; together with ETF flow shifts, these dynamics help explain the speed and depth of drawdowns without invoking conspiracy.
“The truth is more mundane: long-term holders are taking profits, leveraged positions are being forced closed, and some are writing covered calls,” said Matt Hougan, CIO at Bitwise Asset Management.
Cycle context, liquidity, and institutional risks shaping near-term sentiment
Cycle framing is also evolving as market structure matures. As institutional vehicles and clearer regulatory pathways shape participation, short-term liquidity, and not folklore about fixed timelines, appears to be a more immediate driver of price behavior. In this context, the absence of hard evidence behind market manipulation claims keeps attention on measurable variables such as ETF flows, derivatives positioning, and realized liquidity.
Institutional risk assessments remain mixed. Jefferies’ Christopher Wood has cited quantum computing as a long-term vulnerability to Bitcoin’s cryptography and has reduced exposure on that basis, illustrating how strategic risk management, rather than near-term narratives, can influence allocation decisions.
At the time of this writing, Bitcoin (BTC) is around $67,465 with a 14-day RSI near 42.32 and measured volatility at approximately 9.08% over the observed horizon. The asset sits below the cited 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages (about 79,499 and 98,192), alongside a Bearish sentiment tag and 11 green days in the last 30 sessions (37%). These figures are descriptive and do not imply a forecast or recommendation.
| Disclaimer: The content on The CCPress is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. |

