LIVE
World Data Centre Summit - Vietnam 2026◆Blast L2 Shuts Down: November 2027 Claim Deadline◆Why Is Cardano (ADA) Price Surging Today?◆Bitcoin Resilience After Crypto's Biggest Hack: Ki Young Ju◆World Data Centre Summit - Philippines 2026◆Why Is Jupiter (JUP) Price Surging Today?◆Biggest Crypto Regulatory Moves of Q4 2026◆World Data Centre Summit - Hyderabad 2026◆BitGo Announces Stacks Integration for Institutional Bitcoin Staking◆Why Is Pepe (PEPE) Price Surging Today?◆World Data Centre Summit - Vietnam 2026◆Blast L2 Shuts Down: November 2027 Claim Deadline◆Why Is Cardano (ADA) Price Surging Today?◆Bitcoin Resilience After Crypto's Biggest Hack: Ki Young Ju◆World Data Centre Summit - Philippines 2026◆Why Is Jupiter (JUP) Price Surging Today?◆Biggest Crypto Regulatory Moves of Q4 2026◆World Data Centre Summit - Hyderabad 2026◆BitGo Announces Stacks Integration for Institutional Bitcoin Staking◆Why Is Pepe (PEPE) Price Surging Today?◆
Homepage/News/Crypto Scam Leads to $50M USDT Theft on Ethereum
NEWS
News

Crypto Scam Leads to $50M USDT Theft on Ethereum

·2 MIN READ·
MakeThe CC Presspreferred onGoogle

A cryptocurrency trader lost nearly $50 million in USDT through an address-poisoning scam on Ethereum, where the stolen funds were quickly routed through decentralized exchanges.

KEY FINDINGS - EVIDENCE LEVEL: MULTI-SOURCE
1Key sections mapped in this report
0Internal references connected to related coverage
1External source domains cited in the article
2 minEstimated time to read the full report
Key Takeaways:
  • $50 million in USDT stolen using address-poisoning scam.
  • Funds moved into DAI, then ETH.
  • ETH swapped via Tornado Cash for anonymity.

This incident underscores the vulnerabilities in crypto transaction protocols and emphasizes the need for improved security measures to prevent similar future occurrences.

On Ethereum, an address-poisoning scam led to the theft of nearly $50 million in USDT from a single wallet. Funds rapidly converted to DAI and then into ETH before entering Tornado Cash, eliminating traceability. “Attacker swapped USDT to DAI through MetaMask, then to ETH, and deposited the ETH into Tornado Cash to break traceability.”

The victim remains unidentified while attackers used an externally owned account to execute the theft via a spoofed wallet address. No entity has claimed the loss as of current updates.

The event, marked as one significant operational error, underscores vulnerabilities in crypto transfer processes. Funds converted to non-freezeable assets prevented Tether interventions and highlighted systemic risk concerns.

This incident highlights address-poisoning as a rising threat in crypto security. It also led to discussions on wallet user experience and transaction verification protocols within the crypto industry. User withdrew nearly 50M USDT from Binance, did a 50 USDT test, then mistakenly copied a poisoned address from history and sent the remaining 49,999,950 USDT to the attacker.

The attack has shown how quickly funds can be laundered using decentralized paths without traceability. It urges users to adopt advanced verification techniques to mitigate risks.

Potential technological adjustments might include enhanced wallet UX, greater use of whitelists, and protocols to prevent similar future cases, influenced by regulatory and industry pressures.

Disclaimer:

The content on The CCPress is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

SOURCE TRANSPARENCY
  • External Source - Referenced domain: twitter.com
  • Byline - Reported by Solomon M.
  • Coverage Desk - Primary editorial category: News
  • Media Asset - Featured image served from the WordPress media library