- Vitalik Buterin urges Ethereum L2 transition to ZK proofs, reducing withdrawal times.
- Potential for faster asset withdrawals in Ethereum ecosystem highlighted by Buterin.
- Market may see increased liquidity and developer interest in ZK-centric solutions.
Vitalik Buterin announced that Ethereum Layer 2 should shift from Optimistic Rollups to Zero-Knowledge proofs for faster withdrawal times, enhancing user experience and Ethereum’s dominance.
The potential upgrade could significantly impact ETH liquidity, attract developer interest to ZK solutions, and boost Ethereum’s role as a central economic platform.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin suggests Layer 2 solutions shift from Optimistic Rollups to Zero-Knowledge proofs. The proposal aims for faster withdrawals, targeting sub-hour times shortly and potentially achieving as low as 12 seconds medium-term. In his view, this upgrade will solidify Ethereum’s dominance as a platform for asset issuance.
Buterin emphasizes the need to abandon the Optimistic proof system, citing lengthy withdrawal times of several days. The Ethereum Foundation plans to integrate zkEVM, enhancing efficiency by allowing validators to check only ZK proofs instead of re-running transaction blocks.
Vitalik Buterin, Co-founder, Ethereum, – “If the native withdrawal time can be shortened to under 1 hour in the short term and to 12 seconds in the medium term, it will further solidify Ethereum Layer 1 as the default platform for issuing assets and the economic center of the Ethereum ecosystem.” [2]
The transition could significantly impact Ethereum and related assets by improving liquidity and user experience. Reducing withdrawal time lowers capital lock-in, boosting Ethereum’s utility and market liquidity. Assets such as Optimism, Arbitrum, and zkSync may see increased interest from developers and the market.
Zero-Knowledge technology advancements have made hybrid approaches feasible, balancing security, speed, and maturity. This transition could result in shifts in Total Value Locked and improve capital costs for liquidity providers. However, no major regulatory or institutional statements on the technical transition have been noted so far.
| Disclaimer: The content on The CCPress is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. |
