- FTX challenges 3AC’s $1.53 billion claim.
- Claim impacts creditor recoveries by 20%.
- 3AC’s claim stems from FTX collapse.
FTX’s objection to Three Arrows Capital’s claim highlights the extensive impact on creditors, stirring concerns over market recoveries. It raises crucial questions on the legal treatment of substantial late-stage claims amidst financial distress.
FTX’s bankruptcy lawyers dispute 3AC’s $1.53 billion claim, stating it is “unreasonable and unsupportable.” The claim, initially $120 million, was approved by the Delaware bankruptcy court, though FTX argues its account’s actual value at collapse was $284 million. Three Arrows Capital was a major trading and lending partner of FTX. The claim’s approval could notably reduce FTX creditor recoveries by approximately 20%. Louis D’Origny, CFO, FTX Creditors, noted:
“The ruling would also increase the claim pool by 20%, which would be a disaster for customer creditors. He added that significantly lower recoveries were to be expected if 3AC gets the $1.5 billion claim in FTX. … The money would go to the creditors of Three Arrows Capital, who were in ‘deep water’ but would ‘smash the recovery expectations’ if they got over $1.5 billion.”
The objection spotlights broader concerns within the crypto industry regarding claims handling in bankruptcies. Historical cases like Mt. Gox and Celsius have shown how large claims extend litigation and drain estate resources. The debate over this claim reflects deeper issues of asset management and undisclosed liabilities within failing crypto firms. Given 3AC’s involvement, the case reinforces the need for transparent operations in crypto markets. Experts suggest the decision might impact liquidity by altering creditor and market expectations.
FTX’s objection could set a precedent affecting future crypto bankruptcies. Regulatory scrutiny on asset valuations and claim validations might intensify following this dispute. The outcome may determine how claim hierarchies are established for crypto firms during liquidation. The case also illustrates how regulatory environments shape creditor recoveries during market collapses.
| Disclaimer: The content on The CCPress is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. |
