India’s BJP Leader Advocates for Bitcoin Reserve

Pradeep Bhandari, a spokesperson for India’s Bharatiya Janata Party, has suggested that India establish a Bitcoin reserve. Bhandari’s proposal comes as interest in Bitcoin reserves grows internationally, highlighting the need for clear crypto policies in India.

Pradeep Bhandari, a key figure in India’s BJP, has proposed that the country create a strategic Bitcoin reserve. His reasoning is influenced by the successful models from the U.S. and Bhutan, which have established national Bitcoin reserves.

The proposal calls for India to leverage its renewable energy resources to mine Bitcoin, following Bhutan’s model. This aims to position Bitcoin within India’s economic framework, as discussed in Bhandari’s recent public statements: “India, with its substantial renewable energy capacity, could emulate Bhutan’s model of using surplus hydropower to mine Bitcoin. Bhutan has successfully amassed a Bitcoin reserve worth over $1 billion, which now funds public services and green projects. India’s crypto policy, currently taxed but unregulated, needs clarity to unlock its full potential.”

If implemented, the proposal may significantly impact India’s approach to digital assets. While no official government policy is in place, such advocacy could indicate potential shifts in regulatory perspectives and economic strategies involving Bitcoin.

Financially, adopting Bitcoin as a reserve could provide inflation hedge benefits, similar to the U.S. and Bhutan’s use of digital currencies. It remains contingent on political and regulatory alignment within India.

Bitcoin’s potential as a national reserve asset ties closely to global trends. India could benefit by aligning its digital asset strategy with broader economic goals, potentially influencing regional crypto dynamics.

Insights from international experiences suggest substantial economic advantages from a national Bitcoin reserve. India’s move could set a precedent in policy direction and crypto asset integration within national fiscal plans, should regulatory frameworks adapt.