- Jimmy Song criticizes Bitcoin Core developers over OP_Return change.
- Song warns of decentralization risks.
- Node migrations highlight dissent in the community.

Jimmy Song criticized Bitcoin Core developers for removing the 80-byte limit on OP_Return, suggesting this move reflects a ‘fiat’ mentality, threatening Bitcoin’s decentralization and efficiency.
The decision has sparked controversy over governance, as node migrations indicate dissent, likening the scenario to past Bitcoin block size debates.
Speaking out against the recent Bitcoin Core decision, Jimmy Song criticized developers for removing the 80-byte limit on OP_Return. This move has sparked fears of compromising Bitcoin’s decentralization and efficiency, raising substantial debate within the community.
Jimmy Song, known for his minimalist philosophy, warns that Bitcoin Core’s action reflects a “fiat” mentality, bypassing community consensus. The change coincides with a rising migration to Bitcoin Knots, which maintains stricter limits, showcasing clear operational dissent. “The ambiguity over what constitutes ‘spam’ is being used as a stalling tactic. This is classic fiat mentality—ignoring community dissent and using central authority to ram through debatable code changes.”
Node operators have reacted by switching to Bitcoin Knots, elevating its network share to nearly 20%. This reflects a lack of alignment with core developers’ latest decisions, highlighting community fragmentation and technical dissatisfaction over Bitcoin’s governance direction.
While financially, Bitcoin remains stable with no immediate market disruptions, the community split recalls the 2015-2017 block size debate resulting in the Bitcoin Cash split. Long-term impacts on network integrity and governance remain uncertain at this juncture.
Public reaction indicates a rising division within the Bitcoin community, mirroring past schisms. Conversations online reveal a growing concern about centralized decision-making in open-source environments. This issue continues to stir discussions among developers and enthusiasts.
Historically, community dissent can lead to hard forks or governance shifts, as seen with Bitcoin Cash. The increasing use of alternative node clients suggests a potential realignment in how Bitcoin operates, possibly affecting its technological direction long-term.
Disclaimer: The content on The CCPress is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. |