Why Zcash-led privacy coins surged: payments utility and compliance features
Privacy-focused cryptocurrencies entered a renaissance in 2025, with Zcash rising roughly 600% to 820% for the year and Monero advancing about 130%, as reported by CoinGape. Beyond price, the driver cited by market coverage was a shift toward using these networks as privacy-preserving payment infrastructure rather than purely speculative assets.
The core thesis is that optional privacy, selective disclosure, and auditability features positioned Zcash, and to a lesser extent peers, to function as privacy coins as payment rails. Zcash shielded transactions use zero-knowledge proofs to encrypt amounts and addresses while preserving verifiability; viewing keys can disclose details to auditors when required. CoinDesk Research has described how this design supports compliance-sensitive payments by allowing users and institutions to choose between transparent and shielded flows without abandoning regulatory reporting.
Zcash vs Monero: optional privacy, default anonymity, exchange access
Zcash was built with two address types, transparent and shielded, plus viewing keys that enable selective disclosure, which can facilitate institutional workflows that require audit trails. Monero, by contrast, defaults to anonymity across transactions, which strengthens baseline privacy but can complicate exchange listings and custody in jurisdictions that emphasize traceability for AML and KYC.
In editorial terms, this is the central trade-off: optional privacy can expand exchange access, while default anonymity can restrict it under certain policies. “Unlike monero, which will likely remain unavailable on major Western-regulated exchanges, zcash offers flexibility, with optional privacy that can be activated when needed,” said Ray Youssef, CEO of NoOnes. He characterized ZEC as relatively more acceptable for compliance than XMR, reflecting how design choices influence Monero regulatory compliance outcomes across platforms.
At the time of this writing, Zcash (ZEC) trades near $241.80, with sentiment flagged as bearish, very high 15.97% volatility, a 14-day RSI around 39.75, and spot levels below trend on SMA50 (~329.95) and SMA200 (~286.52). These metrics provide context only and do not imply any investment view.
Evidence: shielded pool growth, transaction mix, and service restrictions
Institutional commentary has pointed to on-chain adoption signals: in its Q4 2025 review, Grayscale highlighted rising use of Zcash’s shielded pool and included the asset among privacy networks to watch, interpreting the trend as consistent with emerging payments use rather than solely trading activity. The report framed ZEC’s optional privacy and selective disclosure as factors that may ease integration into regulated operational stacks.
Regulatory actions also help explain market structure. Dubai’s financial regulator (DFSA) moved to prohibit firms under its jurisdiction from offering services related to privacy tokens, including listing, trading, or promoting assets like Monero and Zcash, while not criminalizing self-custody, as reported by Cointelegraph. Such service restrictions illustrate why access can diverge across jurisdictions even when underlying technology enables auditability.
Taken together, three patterns are visible in public reporting and policy: growing shielded activity suggesting real payments experimentation, design choices that enable or limit exchange access, and jurisdiction-specific service rules that can expand or contract liquidity. While these developments support the view that privacy networks are evolving into payment rails, further progress likely depends on merchant integrations, standardized compliance tooling, and consistent rulemaking across markets.
| Disclaimer: The content on The CCPress is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. |

